C This

June 14, 2010In this edition, myths about working mothers are busted, the importance of engaging women on climate change is explored, and Australia's "blokey," or chauvinistic, culture is analyzed. Author Susan Douglas takes on “a new, subtle form of sexism,” and we look at disturbing information about the wealth gap for black and Hispanic women in America.


Gap, What Gap?

Startling new data on the wealth gap for single black and hispanic women only garnered one national television news mention, one NPR news story, two opinion pieces and one newspaper report. What did everyone miss? The fact that “single black women have a median wealth of $100 and Hispanic women $120—dramatically lower than white men ($43,800), white women ($41,500) or black men ($7,900),” according to the report.

READ: “Wealth Gap Yawns—and So Do Media,” by Julie Hollar, Extra!, June 2010

Women in a Warming World

“Women need to be protected, engaged, and empowered for climate solutions to truly succeed,” writes Kari Manlove of the Center for American Progress. Involving women at high-level climate negotiations is one place to start.

READ: “Women’s Role in a Warming World,” by Kari Manlove, Center for American Progress, 5/26/10

Inequity Down Under

Last year, the Australia Securities Exchange (ASX) announced a proposal to expand corporate governance principles to include a mandatory gender diversity policy. In a country where a “blokey” culture rules, what effect will this have upon Australian corporate culture?

READ: “Not So Wizard in Oz,” by Cleo, The Gender Blog, 5/26/10

Myth Busting

The Washington Post tackles myths about working mothers. Did you know, for example, that working women (and men, for that matter) today spend more time with their children than ever before? Or that the more education a woman receives the less likely she is to “op-out” of her career? Consider these myths busted.

READ: “Five myths about working mothers,” by Naomi Cahn and June Carbone, The Washington Post, 5/30/10

An Insidious Bias

What is “enlightened sexism?” According to author Susan Douglas, this new, subtle form of sexism “insists that full equality for women has been achieved … so it's OK to resurrect retrograde, sexist images of women in the media, all with a wink and a laugh.” I agree with Douglas— how else to explain the sexist imagery and language that still pervades our media?

READ: “The New Sexism,” by Laura Fitzpatrick, Time, 3/16/10


The views expressed herein are solely those of the guest blogger and do not necessarily reflect those of Catalyst. Catalyst does not endorse any political candidates. The post and the comments are presented only for the purpose of informing the public.